Devin Stone aka LegalEagle recently posted a YouTube video titled “’I’m Suing Meta, TikTok, Snap”. He is taking part in furthering a moral panic with indissoluble homophobic roots that is currently being used to obliterate our rights.
Mass surveillance and censorship laws DO NOT harm Big Tech.
Meta is currently using the “Social Media Addiction” Trial verdict to destroy anonymous internet access for everyone.
This lawsuit is backed by the Heritage Foundation and Morality in Media. Far-right Christian fundamentalist hate groups!!I was actually in the room for the “Social Media Addiction” lawsuit.
Kaley’s mom made her life a living hell. Her mom was weighing her every day, telling her she’s fat. Her mom physically abused her. Her father physically abused and abandoned her.
Yet, her unhappiness is solely blamed on her making fan edits on Instagram and Instagram messaging the few friends she had.
When you put that liability on Instagram, you abdicate everyone else’s responsibility. They don’t have to prosecute these child abuse cases because they can just blame it on Instagram!!Ironically, this girl currently works in social media marketing. And her abusive mom has now been rewarded with millions of dollars.
And it’s so harmful because they’re continually telling children that social media is causing their problems. And then when these kids quit social media and they become even more isolated and depressed, they blame themselves.
The whole point of this lawsuit is to punch holes in Section 230.
Taylor Lorenz
This whole thing is just a complete racket. It’s horrible. It’s rewarding abusive parents and scam lawyers who want to push this moral panic and set a legal precedent that is being used to obliterate our rights.
Why the Metaverse Actually Failed
Is Silicon Valley actually making progress, or are they just breaking the world for profit?
In this episode of Free Speech Friday, I’m joined by legal scholar and surveillance expert Albert Fox Cahn to dismantle the “Move Fast and Break Things” ethos that has dominated tech for a decade. From the multibillion-dollar failure of the Metaverse to the “innovation theater” of the Apple Vision Pro, we explore why the most hyped technologies are often the most disastrous.
Taylor Lorenz
We dive deep into the dark side of home security, revealing how Ring cameras have turned from safety tools into a massive surveillance network for law enforcement, sometimes even recording your most private moments without a warrant. We also tackle the “AI bubble,” the myth of police body cameras, and why the “boring” analog solutions are often the safest bet for our future.
Albert is the founder of the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project (S.T.O.P.) and the author of the new book, Move Slow and Upgrade: The Power of Incremental Innovation.
They Are Trying To Kill The Internet
🚨 URGENT: Section 230 is under attack and it affects EVERY person who uses the internet. This is part 1 of my deep-dive series exposing the truth about the most important internet law ever created.
Joseph Gordon-Levitt Needs To Shut TF Up
Joseph Gordon-Levitt is promoting pro-ICE AI surveillance laws, while claiming to be “progressive.”
The Trump Admin Censored Jimmy Kimmel — And They’re Not Done
The Trump Admin Censored Jimmy Kimmel — And They’re Not Done
A commenter wrote this correction about the video:
1:25 Incorrect ❌ Jimmy never said the perpetrator is MAGA. What he said was that MAGA are doing everything hoping he’s not one of theirs. Massive difference! He said that because there was discourse about the perpetrators political beliefs so Jimmy was pointing out how the President & those on the right prematurely/irresponsibly blamed the left. It was a sensible statement from Jimmy. How people misinterpret words to suit their agenda is worrying. The truth is Trump’s cronies applied pressure to the network & this supposed joke was used as an excuse to get Jimmy off the air. (@Junier-Hussein on YouTube)
The worst update in YouTube history
This week, YouTube rolled out automatic age verification in the US. Users who the company’s AI system determines may be under 18 are forced to provide their ID or a full biometric scan just to watch certain videos. YouTube is the latest major tech platform to preemptively normalize invasive identity verification for everyday online activity—and it’s a disaster.
This new identity verification system sets a dangerous precedent. It builds a surveillance infrastructure that normalizes the tracking of legal and previously anonymous content consumption—all under the guise of child safety.
On this week’s Free Speech Friday, I explore why the preemptive AI age and identity verification used by YouTube and other tech companies like Instagram and Roblox is so harmful and how it could change YouTube forever.
Why we can’t stop doxxing people for fun
Footage of a couple on a giant screen during a Coldplay concert in Boston went viral because the man and woman were married—but not to each other. Within minutes of the video being posted on TikTok and X, users banded together to identify the couple in the video using AI and facial recognition.
Crowdsourced social media investigations are becoming more common, and those responsible are increasingly using dystopian surveillance technologies that police and federal agencies are using against illegal immigrants and marginalized groups. At the same time, our privacy is being eroded.
Jason Koebler of 404 Media sat down with Taylor Lorenz to explore the origins of the surveillance and entertainment economy, how and why it evolved, and what we can do to protect ourselves.
Mass censorship is coming. Are you ready?
The UK’s Online Safety Act came into force this week and has wreaked enormous havoc. Entire forums, websites, communities, and important journalistic content are being censored. Users are being forced to scan their faces to use apps like Spotify and YouTube.
Like all such terrible censorship laws, the Online Safety Act claims to protect children from the dangers of pornographic and adult content. However, immediately after it came into force, platforms began classifying almost all breaking news, war reports, investigative journalism, political protest materials, and information on reproductive and public health as “explicit” or “harmful” content, thus denying access to it to anyone under 18.
Taylor Lorenz explains the consequences of the UK’s Online Safety Act, its significance for the future of the internet, and what we in the US face if we don’t act quickly to protect free speech online.